Business document comparisons Essay Example for Free

Business document comparisons EssayDocument name universal council letter Thank you letter for participating in a marathon for a charity Purpose of the document To inform a member of the society to put a halt to the constant barking of their dog between certain times of the night To congratulate a member who took part in the puff of a marathon for charity and thank him/her for His/her efforts in participation. Also inform the participant of his/her position in the competition. Target audience Specified house possessor ages 18+ Specified participant in competition. Writing style and tone.Formal language but written so that the matter is taking seriously with no use of passive language i. e. please can you stop that dog barking, but dont worry if you cant do it straight a modality because this takes a perceive of seriousness away from the letter. A congratulating and formal passage of writing. Specified to respect the recipient and his/her efforts. Presentation style This doc ument is non set out to get or catch the eyes of people it is purely to present the recipient with the purpose/problem. So a variety of act upon and shades are not used as there is no reason to. This document is based as a certificate with a letter.As it was produced to congratulate someones achievement. it has lots of colours and images on the topic of sport. Layout Logo. Address of recipient and councils address. Text (the main stop/purpose of the document). Signature from person who wrote the letter. Logo. Address of recipient and councils address. Text (the main point/purpose of the document). Signature from person who wrote the letter. Accuracy, clarity and consistency The letter was made for its purpose the letter goes straight to the point and does need anything else. The writing is specific and formal, with no spelling mistakes.It is also sticking to specifics and with formal language. It is more recipient friendly, what I mean by this is that the language is congratulat ory towards the person and is of less urgency, in the way that something has been done wrong and needs to be acted on. What I would improve I dont think there is any improvement take on this invoice, it has said what it has needed to and given the appropriate details for the recipient This is a good letter but I think there is an area of improvement for the presentation style. doyen smith 11k Letter comparison Dean smith 11k Letter comparison.

Lower middle class Essay Example for Free

Lower middle class EssayThis exit is an extract from M.T. Andersons dystopian novel of consumerism and corporate America. The course is a dialogue amongst ii key characters, Titus and Violet, who each represent contrasting views of the cyber mentality and advertising control. Unlike the passage the novel depicts humanities descent into a decaying society which has no redemption. This passage opens with a short, sharp dialogue between two characters, no names are mentioned and we really dont have a go at it who they are. Yet we sense there must be a bond between them because of the acquiescence of the second character (eg. I did, I listened). We realise that the clack (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97) is between the two key characters, Titus and Violet, on their visit to a mall.Clearly the narrator is also the protagonist, Titus, teen from an upper middle class family, who for the most percentage is content with his consumer lifestyle. In this conversation Violet is forcing him to question and resist the establish (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97) but he is clearly too entrenched within the program to resist. Although he helps her create wild consumer profiles while at the mall, his background helps him resist her strong push to break away from those (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97) people.Titus is brainwashed to accept the trademark marketing of the feed because he was chipped as an infant. Although he appears compliant in this passage, it is obvious that he is only doing it to please Violet, alrightok (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97). Just like in the slumber of the novel Titus is blind to Violets urgency in escaping the feed. It is clear he is unaware of the environmental disasters that are happening more or less him globally and as the passage suggests he is prepared to accept the status quo and conform because in his words thats the feed so what (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97).He is so oblivious of the dangers around him, he doesnt even realise that her resistance is causing her slow death. The she in the passage, is obviously Violet. She is the one directing and controlling the dialog between the two teenagers. It is clear that she has a sense of desperation and perhaps paranoia, because she recognizes that they are watching us right now (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97). Her ramblings sound ridiculous to Titus despite the fact that he does exactly as she says. Violets plan in this passage is to resist the feed by tricking them into thinking that she has a wide and random medley of interests in advertising.The reader is reminded that Violet is not a mainstream teenager, she has been raised by an eccentric parent and was home schooled. Making her different to Titus and his friends, who got their implant at infancy she received hers at the age of seven. Violet views the feed negatively, different from Titus and his friends, perhaps because she comes from a lower middle class background. Anderson creates her to challenge the system she is living unde r, as she says in the passage they tried to figure out who you aremake you conformits like a spiral (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97).Her disgust and her rebellion against this affable norm that everybody else accepts will ultimately shut down her body parts and because her father cannot afford repairs, her body will go into malfunction and she will eventually die. In fact the book ends with Violet dying and the feed saying everything must go (Anderson, 2002). This death creates a voice from Anderson suggesting a society of numbness and hopelessness. The narrative of this passage positions the reader to take sides. It is unclear just how contrasting the belief of the two characters is. The narrator is clearly submissive and the reader is eager to call up out why. Why does he do as she asks?Why does he listen as she asks? One is keen to find out the reason croupe her pushiness. The passage opens with she said (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97) and in the commencement two lines, he looks aro und (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97) as she tells him to, he listens (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97) as she instructs him, but it is clear at the end of the passage that he does not necessarily agree, as he says so what? (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97). The mall is used symbolically and metaphorically to represent the social demographic of these two teenagers lives and it is here that Violet is trying to convince Titus to distance himself from the tentacles of the cyber octopus that is the feed.In fact, the telepathic closeness that this feednet creates between people is obvious in the first couple of lines of this passage, where one character agrees with the suggestions of the other. The passage is structured with a combination of sentence lengths, it opens and closes with very short sharp phrases, almost building up into a vortex of explanation. In the middle of the passage sentences are longer because there is so much more to explain, making meaning difficult to understand. There is a distinc t pattern of alliteration used as a force of reinforcement, she said (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97) and wanting, watching, waiting (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97).The tone of the passage begins with a casual conversation between two teenagers and develops almost into a political rhetoric. The conversation is almost childlike, simple, about toys (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97), about things (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97), about games (Anderson, 2002, pp. 96-97), hiding a more sinister and psychological message. The passage replicates Andersons overall view of society. He uses the language of youth culture, presenting the novel/passage in the first person narrative through Titus who is often closed and unpredictable. In the passage the reader is positioned to accept Violets (her) view of the world because we cannot trust Titus biased point of view. Nevertheless, Anderson has created authentic adolescent voices, sometimes risible but always honest.Titus represents the apathetic accepting team and V iolet of course incites the readers admiration for her challenge to a society, which is overlooking the dangers of overpowering consumerism. We cannot reveal but see Andersons satire through Violets voice and his criticism of wealth, status, consumerism, corporate America, messaged advertising, conglomerates, and a society falling into a habitual disaster of its own making. The passage is short but captures the essence of Andersons meaning and criticism of societies obsessed with consumerism.

Three Factors That Form Individual Ethics Philosophy Essay

Three Factors That Form Individual ethics Philosophy Essay deterrent exampleity is the division of study commerce with suitable path of an achievement for man. It is the study of correct and wrong in individual endeavours. At a more first-string level, it is the process where we categorize our apprizes and practise them.Ethics in the field of philosophy content that the revise and assessment of human behaviour in the burn down of clean theories. Moral theories might be observed addition each(prenominal)y as the model of behaviour that human universes have built for themselves or as the corpse of responsibilities and functions that a demanding society needs of its associates.Ethics evoke also be generally be defined as the dogmas of deterrent examplely acceptable conduct of individuals. Ethics also means an individuals individualal precepts ab knocked disclose(p) right and wrong behaviours.Ethics is a must for human spiritedness. It is our indications of making our min d up a course of action. Without it, our battles would be haphazard and pointless. there can be no technique to work in the direction of an objective as there would be no method to choose between a n incessantly closing numbers of objectives.Yet with an ethical model, we might be non capable to practise our goals with the diorama of success. To the quantity which a realistic ethical model is taken, we ar proficient to perfectly classify our goals and battles to accomplish our most imperative set. Any mistake in our ethics will ease our ability to be successful in our endeavours.A suitable base of ethics needs a standard of consequence to which all objectives and battles can be balanced to. This model is our own lives, and the plea sure which makes them liveable. This is our vital model of importance, where the goal in which an ethical man must cultivate at all times.It is turn up at by an assessment of mans nature, and identify his strange needs. A structure of ethics must a dditionally brood of not only emergency circumstances, merely the usual resources we make continuously. It must consist of our relations to others, and identify their importance not only to our physical endurance, but to our interests and happiness.Furthermore, ethics is also know as private organise of values used by a person to direct their actions, and to be aw be with each responsibility. Ethics are not intention, but are slanted to the individual. Ethics are a constantly developing policy of behaviour charge upon situations and the heart practices of the individual.According to Mary, 1956, ethics are the relative to our observation of authenticity, and are also based in the lead of a detailed viewpoint. Weas human beings, the moral command are classified by the individuals. It has been started when the children are being skilled with suitable behaviours based on common norms and parental significances. These norms and values are being used to grant a structure for the pr ogression of the individual values.Therefore, there has no perceptions can advertk to define ethics. It is not viable for either iodine of the persons to claim total common awareness and subjectivity. In addition, human beings are not all-powerful and dependable. Some of them may go all-out for the excellence, but our actually humanness will certify that accomplishment is not attained.Meanwhile, it is agreed that ethics are the persons set of values, whereby they must not be used to create gigantic assertions of true or false without tolerate for disagreement and the argument. Ethics have to be used to help each of the human beings to identify our own support so that we live as stated to the top forms that we, as individuals, advised to.Ethics and loyalty to our standards are the guiding principle which we use to review our battles. It is an carriage of self-measurement of development or of obligation to the perfects which we struggle towards. The factors in our usual vital ity may give uncorrupted reason for some action, or take the meet off its harshness we are still dependable for our choices.Choices need to be investigated before an enlightened choice is being made. Ethics need to be mum usually at times of predicament or an internalized modification. This happens because a belief is been shown to be incorrect or when the certainty fails to take into reflection a rattling specific set of situations.At those times, the entity should realistically view on their certainty, and make an internal inquiry as to the noesis which had been produced by them. Considerations are needed to vagabond if theres a new set of values is required, or if active values need only been modified to reflect those situation.Ethics must not be used to ditch one set of narrow faiths adjacent to another. The split created by such traditions becomes one of severe obedience to a set of distinct values, and teaches prejudice for changes in another set of significances.Ethic s must not be followed sightless nor should share morals which can be spoken out the ethical norms for all those individuals. In example, where this has been happened, the loads have roller blindly followed like sheep, following the firm point of views of a selected numbers. Ethics must not interrupt in the lead of the private lives of any other individuals who is not hurting anyone.NormsFirst factor that forms individual ethics is norms. Norms are a profitable shootline for the affable behaviour. It has to be made active before they can point the behaviour when the persons are in a situation of deindividuation. They only see themselves in the name of group individuality, and their behaviours are probable to be guided by group norms alone. Norm of loving reciprocity expresses us to return to other services, good qualities and kindness they offer us. The door in the face technique is used in norms as thats not all technique, and in advertising the big top of the line. Norm of so cial commitments also expresses us to maintain with our promises as this norm is being used in the low-ball technique. In addition, norm of obedience directs us in the direction of submission to the abilities. Milgram explain this agreement in his studies where contributors had to deliver frights to suffering victims.It is also has the possibility to resist being influenced by norms. People who display their reactance by fighting against the fear to their liberty of action when they find norms were out of place. The attitudes and norms normally work simultaneously to manipulate behaviour either directly or indirectly. As stated in the theory of planned behaviour, purposes are the function of three factors which is manners about behaviour, common norms applicable to the behaviour and awareness of organized oer the behaviour. Therefore, when the thoughts and norms disagree, their pressure on behaviour will depend on their relative convenience. There are 3 personal experience examples of norms as stated beneathThank you is an example of norms. This is expected when we as human being express appreciation for helpful, supportive and kind manners.We express sympathy by saying naughty to hear this when we hear about another individuals difficulty in any situation. Failing to express sympathy, might result in the view that the person is thoughtless.In our daily life, we should help the multitude who had helped us. You wish to take annual leave to attend relatives wedding and you suppose to work on the day. You asked your colleague to cover for you. And you may be expected to agree similar request from your colleague in future.BeliefBelief is defined as the mental mind-set that some intentions are true. In most of the given intention, most of the individual either has or be short of the mental attitude that it is true. Therefore, there is none of any primal point ground between the occurrences of nonappearance of a belief. For an example, in the case of gods, most of the individuals either have the belief that at least one god in a number of sorts is real or they lack any such belief. In addition, belief is different from judgment, which is a mental act that involves arriving at an ending about an intention and consequently creating a belief among the individuals.Whereby, belief is the mental thoughts that some intention is correct rather than wrong. Decision after believing in something is the evaluation of an intention as realistic, fair, confusing and etc. It is because one type of character is not necessary for a belief to be continuously and purposely parented. A belief that thought a god exists often depends on a few other beliefs which some individuals have not intentionally considered. There are a few examples below based on my personal experienceThere were a few situations where I pray to God for something good to happen and it eventually happened and I gained success through that. I started doing this after seeing my parents doing s o. It has become a belief for me as I see what ever my parents pray for, will somehow come to reality one day. The same thing started happening to me. Since that my belief on God has become stronger. This clearly shows that a belief is a mental thought for some intentions to be correct.The other example which I can give for belief is in the method of acclivity up children. I grew up with the care and guidance of my parents. When I was young, I have already started believing that I would be a successful man in future just like my parents because I believed that they would put me in correct path of life for me to gain success. I followed the exact path and I gained success just like how I thought and believed that it would happen one day. I believed my life path showed by my parents and here where I am instantly with good job and education. My belief has lead to a realistic in my life.ValuesValues can be defined as the foundation of beliefs of the persons which guide and encourage t heir attitudes and also actions. A few of the most essential ethical values are truthfulness, commitment, integrity and equality. Bear in mind that not all are ethical or moral values. Therefore, a number of non-ethical values which are considered to be the ethical impartial since they are neither principled nor not principled whereby it inspires behaviour are wealth, status, happiness, attractiveness, taste, comfort and success. These are ethic impartial because there is nothing right with these principles in and of themselves, but how one attains these and what one carries out with these can be right or wrong. Principle values are believed to always take priority over non-ethical morals. Individual moral values are significant in determining principled behaviour, but it is not concentrate on important theoretical ethics predominantly when there is a variation between our individual moral point and our responsibilities to the patient.As for me, many beliefs have changed to values. For instance being caring towards others has become a value because I believed that if I care for a person, I will be cared in return. This statement was brought by my parents where they will keep reminding me to be caring to people around us. This principle or quality that we hold guide the way we live our lives and also decisions we make. It is really worthy to make this belief a value in our life as we build good behaviour in ourselves by being caring and helpful towards people. This actually is inherited and for sure we will bring this value down to the next upcoming generations.In another situation, the change of the belief to a value can be explained through another experience of mine. Since I was a teenager, I have the belief that it is important to spend quality time with our family. We believed that when we spend time together, a lot of problems can be solved. For instance, if any of us have headache, or stressful due to a work or studies, we will mingle and have a close co nversation or do some other activities with our family members and that eventually reduces the headache and stress. In other word, it can be said that we help each other to ease our difficulties. Therefore, I believed very much that spending time together with our family can make us cheerful and free from stress. This belief has changed to value where we hold to it tightly. We made sure to follow this value of sharing ears and shoulders, and helping one another in every situation. This also has led me and other family members to take this value up and take for or change how we live our lives. Our life which is based on a personal code of values brings meaning, purpose, and direction to living.How the rule of law can be used as guide to moral choiceRules and regulations can be found in many places but when it comes to official rules and regulations they are referred as law. law of nature is generated in a society to control the behavior of people that constitute the society. Law is generally found in shapings, legislation and legal opinions. It is also known as a formal mechanism to control socialism. Law is very important and useful to establish and maintain social order. (Glanville Williams)Rules of law can be considered as the base for setting up a society and it helps in making positive changes to the ways of bringing up the society. When a person has the knowledge of law, they can understand public affairs better which is really important for establishment of a society. When law is studied, it will promote some understanding of social values. Thus, it makes the person to choose rules of law for a society by comparing the good effects and bad effects they may have on the society. This choice of rules will create good ethics for the society. All the members must follow the rules gibely and that will eventually create a good social order.For an example, when the organisation set a rule for its members on not to be harsh on the customers, the members shou ld always keep that in mind and obey it all the time. If at all they disobey the rule, they may need to be out of the society or be sacked. Therefore, this rule can be a guide for people to be ethical in that society. They will make sure that they do not be harsh on others in order to maintain a good social order.Social order is considered as an organization or mechanism that exists with the enforcement of rules of laws. A person must learn to obey the rules that are set up for the organization or society and accept them in order to fit him or herself in that society. For most cases, social order is always pre-developed which means it is usually inherited by the older people of that society. They integrated cultures and personalities as a guide to develop the ideas and beliefs for the society which has changed into moral values. In addition to that, moral values shape a persons behaviour and it also manage the group activity within that society. If the established law or values are not followed by the members of a society, conflict may arise. Therefore an organization should always make sure that their members always follow the values practised in that organization in order to maintain smooth relationships and healthy environment.SummaryEthics is the formal study of moral standards and conduct. For this reason ethics is also known as moral philosophy. The study and evaluation of human conduct in the light of moral principles that humans have constructed for themselves or as the life guidelines and cultures that a point society requires for its own members. We had discussed ethics in 3 subtopics which is norms, values and beliefs.In conclusion, first of all, norms are useful tool for the social behaviour of a person towards his daily activity and possess acceptable behaviours that are the unintended, unexpected result of individuals communications. For example, a system of norms specified what is satisfactory and what is not satisfactory in a society or group. Belief is defined as the mind-set of a person that intentions are true, and confidence in the fact or way of life of something. It is proof of a mental attitude of acceptance toward a proposition without the full intellectual evidence required to guarantee its truth. Beliefs have been well-known according to their level of certainty which is mistrust, an opinion, or a confidence. Belief becomes awareness only when the truth of a intention becomes obvious to the believer himself.Values can be concluded as the foundation of beliefs of the persons which guide and encourage their attitudes and belief. There are three main theories of values which humans can have favoured values, instrumental values and fundamental values. Each of it plays an important and unique role in our life in the development of moral standards and moral norm. Values are about belief and ideas of culture that are acceptable or not by a society.Besides that, rules of law that are chosen for an organization or societ y can be used as a guide to moral choice. When rules are to be followed by the members of the organization, a healthy environment and a good social order can be maintained. Rules that are formed in a society will ensure that all the members follow them that eventually become moral values in that organization. When the entire members act according to the moral values formed through the rules, an ethical organization can be formed.

Impact of Social Media on Surveillance Culture

Impact of Social Media on Surveillance CultureEvaluating the Impact of Online Social Networking on Surveillance CultureOnline networking sites such(prenominal) as YouTube, Twitter, Facebook or Instagram atomic number 18 being used immensely as of late. Their prevalence gives new chances for information accumulation by the state and privately owned condescensiones, which calls for an increase in first and hypothetical research on web-based networking media oversight. The terms online networking and well-disposed media were created to portray the correspondence, group, and cooperative characteristics of websites, such as Blogger, companionable network websites such as Facebook and video facilitating st yearss such as YouTube. Regardless of the fact that there has been a consider adapted measure of build up about these terms, principally centred around how they provide programs for new business and promoting opportunities on the web, there ar societal impacts of these innovation s that should be researched (Ellis et al, 2013). This essay will analyse current theory regarding the rising impact of sociable media on inspection husbandry and discuss the frighteningly accurate foretellings of theorists whose work pre dates the social media revolution. Ultimately, displaying the argument that social media has given inspection refining a broadcast to manifest and grow and that this ultimately changes the demeanour of the affected generations.Numerouscurrent meanings of superintendence define a process of entropy accumulation andhandling, and then once again procedures of forming practices (controlling,overseeing, administering, managing, affecting or directing practices) (Fuchs2011, p. 41). Societal supervision includes the accumulation, stockpiling, preparing, and evaluationof information about quite a little or groups of people by a performing artisan topropel the latters objectives. Foucault (1997) recognises that knowledge is proponent and in order to gain and maintain power institutions use surveillance.Through methods such as selective information collecting, governments can turn something ascomplex as human behaviour into chunks of data. Monitoring people throughnumbers in order to maintain social order. However, throughout this essaysurveillance culture will be defined through theorists such as Deleuze (1992)and Haggerty & Ericson (2000) because in their respective researches thereis an downstairsstanding that surveillance is not just limited to institutions asFoucault (1997) suggests. In fact, surveillance is more networked now as engineering science and globalisation has advanced people have require freer moving andhave bigger networks. This has caused a power shift in surveillance that substancethat people are now more than ever able to monitor their peers behaviours.This is a culture of surveillance because it has grown to such a large scalethat people have convey reliant on it, in particular in the example of on linesocial network because now huge chucks of our personal and social life areonline and to step out of this leaves us ostracised.Online networkingcan be utilised as a successful apparatus for socialisation. Numerousindividuals want to use new types of online networking sites keeping in mindthe end goal to be included in this new format of community. It is essential tounderstand the livelyness of the connection betwixt organisations and the public.Extraordinary consideration ought to be paid to the way technology includespeople in surveillance culture because their impression of the public is as an initialform of surveillance (Dinev et al, 2008). Subsequently, social media allows foreffortless control of the participants. As new-fangled research suggests, the features of onlinenetworking can influence young people. Anderson (2009) high well-offs the vastamount of data that becomes available to researchers through the new field ofsocial media, particularly in coitus to violence, and how this is used toinform policy making. This clearly indicates the effect social media has had onsurveillance culture in what could be seen as both a despotic and prohibitmanner. To expand, it could be thought that a new platform in which data can beretrieved without knowledge of the participants often makes for richer and morereliable findings, which could be a possible benefit to policy making. However,this essay will show that because this data is often taken from youths andutilised by those in power (Anderson, 2009), it means that the youngergeneration have no way of informing policy that directly affects them and theirlifestyles. With this in mind, social media clearly provides a space forsurveillance culture to overlook a whole generation and calls for more debatein issues such as protection and screen.The issue ofsurveillance and privacy in the online networking origination is talked broadly aboutin scientific studies. Teenagers may view surveillance on social networ kingboth in a positive and negatively charged location (Stuart and Levine, 2017). However, isimperative to recognise that surveillance online is not merely two-fold, asadvertising for afore mentioned sites incorrectly suggest, interacting onlineis not just you being surveilled by your networked connections and vice versa.It is on the early(a) hand, a method for large-scale organisations to surveil thepublic. It is notable that following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001government surveillance has expanded particularly in the United States. Thesemeasures incorporate an excitement for social networking online (Marks, 2006).Government enthusiasm for online networking is straightforward, to composepossible offenders and terrorists, it is essential to consolidate an extensivevariety of data about individuals. This data incorporates social relations, sharedexercises, confederate networks, and individual information about politicalperspectives, religious convictions, sexual preferences, and inclinationsconcerning regular day-to-day routines. Therefore, social media has clearlyfuelled surveillance culture by providing an opportunity for data to be easilyand unknowingly collected and manipulated accordingly.The consequences for actions on social media,particularly in younger people are not always understood. For instance, thetransferring of their private data to social media websites and the outcomesmight be adverse. In a classroom study, Barnes (2006) highlighted thatattitudes towards social media in youths show that they do not feel aconnection between what they post online and real world consequences and viewonline networking as a separate diversion from the real world. Barnes (2006)demonstrates the connection between web-based social networking and youths in away, which highlights the negative impacts of online networking. As well asthis, this study highlights the lack of education around surveillance cultureon social media that in turn, gives it a bigger platform to go unnoticed ifpeople do not expect their data to be misused they are unlikely to refrain fromgiving it up.Andrejevec (2002) indicates the way that thesurveillance issues concerning online networking usage cannot be taken as an absenceof privacy for the users because the data is already available to be used bythe organisations that do. However, Barnes (2006) highlights that surveillanceculture is infringing on privacy because the lack of education around theprivacy rights of these sights allow these organisations some degree ofautonomy. Therefore, highlighting the lack of control placed on surveillanceculture and the lack of control the public having from being utilised by it.Social media networking can carry a hint ofprivate correspondence with it because of its situational and ordinarycharacter, nevertheless intervened public platforms are not private. This situation is afocal piece of the discourse concerning surveillance and it is particularlyevident regardin g accessible data on social media. Most network websites requestthat their clients give personal details this data is requested during socialnetwork correspondence stages. As such, the required data to profile individualsis not something concealed that must be revealed or recovered utilising fancyequipment, human operators and such (Heidegger 1977, p. 6). Individuals themselves are making this datapublic, free for everyone to access and are therefore fuelling surveillanceculture.Online socialcommunication can have genuine adverse outcomes and has, in this way, offeredan open door for various worries from moral frenzies to paranoid fears (Greenop,2007). This has prompted dialogue of security and education youths clearly shouldbe given training on implicit rules concerning online exercises to figure outhow to secure their selves. Without a doubt, numerous threats prowl in the worldof social networking, incorporating possible security intrusion, misuse ofequity given false data and, n ot slightest, the threat of predators who feelthe need to hurt youngsters. These threats are genuine and ought to be dealtwith. But, critics assert that the training and the security discourse isadditionally an ethical frenzy (Fisher and Lyytinen, 2016). Greenops (2007)mention of paranoia highlights how surveillance culture, particularly since thesocial media age is changing what it means to be human. Foucault highlightsthat the idea of what it means to be human is a recent term and is one that ischanging drastically, it is worth noting that Foucault was not opus at atime where social media had reached its peak but the growth in atechnology- pendent culture was already apparent. A rising dependence on technology is directlylink with mental health issues and the rise of a more neurotic population.Twenge and Campbell (2009) argue that culture in American culture has shiftedfrom centering on community to money and the results mean that a higher numberof younger people are likely to e xperience poor mental health. Furedi (2006)claims that a neurotic population is desired by the state and that fear levelsare being deliberately raised in order to create anxiousness, which in turn, makespeople easier to control. To expand, dependence on social media and technologyas a whole could arguably be making the population more complacent insurveillance. damage such as you have nothing to fear, if you have nothing tohide are often used as a way of normalising mass surveillance and a highlytechnologically dependant community will be more neurotic and anxious andtherefore easier to surveil.Haggerty and Ericson (2000) emphasise that surveillance culture is dependant on the rise of networked communities, with so many people on social media it becomes easy for everyone to surveil each other and therefore surveillance is not yet a tool of large scale institutions but common practice for everyone. There are contending policy, media, and social talks stating that women ought to keep up their privacy at bottom their online presence, yet all the while should openly exhibit themselves online in a specific, gendered way either as mindful or as popular (Ball et al, 2009). In the meantime, as self- showing as private and capable, it is normal for females to increase social capital from freely self-displaying as socially acknowledged, which includes uploading photographs and having numerous online contacts immediately contrary to the desires of self- restraint and privacy (Ball et al 2009, p. 356). These contradictory desires are authorised by social surveillance, where females who do not give in to the societal pressure receive negative judgment or even provocation from other users on social media (Bailey, 2013). It is therefore clear that social media as a way of enforcing behavioural norms has force surveillance culture. Taking intoconsideration the discourse with regards to online interpersonal networking, aconventional and rather contrary origination of surv eillance is renderedobsolete. If surveillance is related to the intrusion of ones privacy and is predominatelya method of discipline (Foucault, 1997). By this definition surveillance isenforced by structures, for example, the Panopticon. The Panopticon is ametaphor for surveillance in which the disciplined are watched at all times andcannot see the watcher. This instils a sense of fear and theoretically enforcesorder. However, the issue is that it does not appear to sufficiently portraythe desire to be surveilled with regards to online networking via social media(Lyon 2006 McGrath 2004). Social mediahas impacted surveillance culture in such a way that it has becameparticipatory and something to be desired, as long as the perception ofyourself you confront is desirable. The ethical frenzies, paranoid fears, andthe challenges in comprehending why individuals really would need toparticipate in online social communication all mirror this tragic view onsurveillance. It is the reason beh ind the talks of privacy and instruction andalso for the possibility that clients are either performing risk examinationsbefore establishing a profile on the social media website or just are not awareof enough regarding the prowling threats of surveillance. The visual illustration ofsurveillance offered by the Panopticon infers a spatial chain of domination wherethe observer is situated over the one being observed. However, this might notbe taken as surveillance being fundamentally a power dynamic in which theobserver is in control of the observed. In fact, surveillance can be viewed asa levelled relationship even for the individual under surveillance, either throughopposition (McGrath, 2004) or as exhibitionism (Koskela, 2004). Furthermore, surveillancecan be conducted by both the watcher and watched, as depicted by Andrejevic(2005) who has presented the idea of horizontal surveillance. Despite the factthat Andrejevic does not explicitly build the association, horizontalsurveillan ce appears to be a helpful idea to shed light on specific parts of socialmedia as everyone who is being surveilled is also surveilling others. Counter arguments in regards to surveillance culture could see it asenabling, as the notice encourage better methods of building personality,meeting companions and partners, along with associating with people outside ofyour social circle. This progresses the part played by the client fromuninvolved to dynamic, given that surveillance in this setting provides someautonomy to the user. Online media communication in this way representssurveillance, as a shared, enabling and subjectivity formulating exercise isin a ecumenical sense quite social (Solove 2007, p. 745). The act of online interpersonal interactioncan be viewed as enabling, as it is an approach to connect with otherindividuals and develop connections deliberately. However, it is critical to notconsequently accept that the practice of networking, which these sites dependon, is just a product for exchanging. It is in fact a form of surveillanceculture that extends on Deleuzes (1992) belief that surveillance is no longerabout monitoring those separate to us but a method of collecting data from the normal and social media is a perfect way of gathering this.To conclude, this essay has demonstrated an understanding ofsurveillance culture is an advancement of surveillance in which beingsurveilled has become participatory. This is due to human beings becomingincreasing technology-dependant. Particularly through the example of socialmedia the impact of surveillance culture has been explored. Firstly as a promptly available source of data which is used to both monitor and adapt thebehaviours of a society by institutions and secondly as a way of encourage participatorysurveillance in turn, causing a complacent attitude towards surveillancecultural. The impact of social media was also shown to deeply affect humanbehaviour in general, creating a more neurotic and anxious population, which asexplained by Furedi (2006), makes people easier to control and in turn, makesthe aims of surveillance culture easier to accomplish.ReferencesAnderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society. 2 (2).77-81.Andrejevic, M. (2002). The Workof Being Watched Interactive Media and the Exploration of Self-Disclosure.Critical Studies inMedia Communication. 19 (2). 230248.Andrejevic, M. (2005). The Work of Watching OneAnother Lateral Surveillance, Risk, and Governance.Surveillance & Society. 2 (4). 479-497.Bailey, J. (2013). Sexualized Online bullyrag Through an Equality Lens Missed Opportunity inAB v. Bragg?McGillLaw Journal. 59 (3). 1-24.Ball, K., Green, N., Koskela, H.and Phillips, D.(2009). Surveillance Studies Needs Gender and Sexuality.Surveillance & Society. 6 (4).352-355.Barnes, S.B. (2006). A privacy paradox Socialnetworking in the United States. FirstMonday. 11 (9). Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on theSocieties of Control. October, 59,3-7Din ev, T., Hart, P. and Mullen, M.R. (2008). Internet privacy concerns and beliefsabout governmentsurveillance. Journal of strategicInformation Systems. 17. 214233.Ellis, D., Harper, D. and Tucker, I.M. (2013). The affective atmospheres ofsurveillance. Theory & Psychology. 23(6). 840855.Fisher, M. and Lyytinen, K. (2016). Social networking as the productionand consumption of a self. Information and organization. 26 (4).131-145.Foucault, M. (1997). Discipline And PunishThe Birth of the Prison. New York time of origin Books.Fuchs, C. (2005). The Internetas a selforganizing sociotechnological system. Cybernetics & Human Knowing. 12 (3). 3781.Furedi, F. (2006). Culture of Fear. London Continuum.Greenop, M. (2007). Facebook The CIA conspiracy. New Zealand Herald. operational from http//www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10456534, (Accessed tertiary February 2018).Haggerty, K.D. andEricson, R.V. (2000). The surveillance assemblage. British Journal of Sociology. 51 (4). 60 5622.Heidegger, M. (1977). The questionconcerning technology. Technologystudies. 3-35.Koskela, H. (2004). Webcams, TVshows and mobile phones Empowering Exhibitionism.Surveillance &Society. 2 (3). 199-215.Lyon, D. (2006).Theorizingsurveillance The panopticon and beyond. Cullompton, Devon Willan Publishing.Marks, P. (2006). Pentagon setsits sights on social networking websites. New Scientist. Available fromhttp//www.newscientist.com/article/mg19025556.200. (Accessed 3rd February 2018).McGrath, J.E. (2004).Lovingbig brother Performance, privacy and surveillance space. London Routledge.Solove, D.J. (2007). Ive gotnothing to hide and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego Law Review. 44 (1). 745.Stuart, A. and Levine, M. (2017). beyond nothing to hide When identity is key to privacy threat under surveillance. Europeanjournal of social psychology. 47 (6). 694-707.Twenge, J. and Campbell, W. (2009). TheNarcissism Epidemic. New York Atria Books.

President John F. Kennedys Inauguration Speech Analysis

President John F. Kennedys Inauguration Speech AnalysisAbstractThis paper provides a rhetorical analysis of President John F. Kennedys inauguration speech. Included is the type of text it is, where it was first spoken, and the main objective. My analysis of this speech includes his clear call to meet for the Ameri shtup lot to unite together with the rest of homophileity to ensure human rights, freedom, peace, and stability for the populace. Also, the larger debate included is how we as Americans, live in a somewhat utopian society where other countries do not and we need to lodge in the responsibility to ensure this right for everyone. Kennedy enforces all three stirred appeals, weather stated specifically or inferred, but his most employ was his appeal to the emotions of the consultation. Also analyzed is his successful use formal and informal manner which is inferred and organization which leads to the conclusion that great admiration for this man can come from this spee ch as well as a call to job that we can all take upon ourselves with the responsibility to carry out this great mans idealistic concepts for the world.JFK Inauguration SpeechJohn F. Kennedys Inaugural speech was given on January 20th, 1961. He spoke to not only the citizens of the United States, but to the entire world. It was clear that his main goal was to unify the entire human race and to make the world a better place for everyone. John F. Kennedy was calling on all Americans to be the difference, to take a stand, to make the change, and to do what is morally right. There was a great reference to our country being the first to revolt against the will of greedy men, and that we are the heirs of that revolution with the duty to uphold and bring basic human rights to all human beings across the globe. His great use of logic and powerful emotions used throughout the speech brought this sense of duty, argued his call to action, and allowed his words to be sooner effective in the uni fication of the citizens of the United States and the rest of the world together.Utopia is the world that comes to mind after reading President Kennedys inauguration speech. In his call to action, he indicated that his administration would be the beginning of change for the betterment of humanity and will need to continue on. He states to Let the word go forth from this age and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americansborn in this century, tempered by state of war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, knightly of our ancient heritageand unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at floor and approximately the world (1961). We as Americans believe in liberty and justice for all people we are all descendants of the soldiers who fought in the revolutionary war to stand united in upholding such principles. Having thi s same background, President Kennedy brings more to the unification of the citizens of the United States. As stated previously, Kennedy further brings a connection to the audience through a civic call to duty, which is directed to everyone. He states to the audience and the world to Ask not what your country can do for youask what you can do for your country (1961). Though this is a huge responsibility to the people of the United States, he makes the acknowledgment that this is possible if each citizen puts forth the effort to make a difference. Through the effort of an entire nation combined, the United States will be commensurate to change the world for the better.In addition to uniting the citizens of the United States as a single entity, President Kennedy accordingly(prenominal) continues to unite the human race as a single entity as well. For example, he made the reference to affiliate whom we share similar values and cultural origins with, our sister countries, as well as the United Nations, from which he makes a pledge to the many different societies around the world that we will ensure that all humanity will be given equal human rights. He continues to develop his theme of unification by references to goals and cultures common to which we share with countries throughout the world. As a result of this, he effectively united all military man throughout the world as one. passim his speech, conveyance of shared backgrounds and morals are used to unite the citizens of the United States and the rest of the world to accomplish the same goals that also unite us together.Kennedy then continues to unite the world by stating that even if we overlook our similar backgrounds, we as Americans share a core set of values, of morals, of ethics as well. President Kennedy uses these values, these ethical and moral appeals in his speech to unite the country even further. He states that Now the trumpet summons us againnot as a call to extend arms, though arms we ne ednot as a call to battle, though embattled we are but a call to bear the burden of a keen-sighted twilight struggle, year in and year out, rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulationa struggle against the common enemies of man tyranny, poverty, disease and war itself (1961). There is a stark connection made, with the presidents ability to impact the world and the audience having the very same capability to make an impact on the entire world. With this, the audience is able to accept President Kennedys call to duty which then, proceeds to credit his speech as being quite effective.Kennedy was trying to unite all Americans and all humans as they exist on this earth and to bring the audience to his call to duty. He used Americans shared backgrounds and their core values to strengthen his call to duty as well as connect the country as one. His call to action is based on the three rhetorical appeals, ethos, pathos and logos. He has appealed emotionally to the audience with patriotism, ho pe, and justice for all humans. Kennedy uses the contrast of feelings such as pride and fear and pity, which invents very well to convey his call to action. He then utilized these negative emotions of pity felt by the audience for parts of the world that have people living in poverty which push people further into his call to duty (1961). Kennedy creates these unwanted feelings in a successful attempt to push people to rid themselves of such emotions. Then, in contrast, he continues to utilize emotional appeals by evoking pride in unifying America and the world. He keeps enforcing his call to duty through emotional appeal. Last, but not least, he has used reason in how he used American values and the cause and effect of the revolution in America to becoming a country who believes in liberty and justice for all. His whole speech makes sense and flows well together from point to point.Kennedys utilization of pathos, appealing to the emotions of his audience is of most importance to h is inaugural speech, in which the chief aim was to unify all Americans and the world together. He states to Let us begin anewremembering on both sides that civility is not a preindication of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate (1961). Kennedy conveyed himself as a man of great integrity that the audience and the world had no choice but to trust him. From my perspective, there was not a single uniform fallacy to be found in this entire speech. Also, the speech was very successful in connecting the people of different backgrounds in the world which puts great focus on his call to action. It was clear that he was very successful in conveying his goal of working towards providing the people of the entire world with human rights as well as peace and stability. We can conclude by stating the fact that Kennedy had a perfect vision for the world. In his closing, he states that Whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the net judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth Gods work must truly be our own (1961). His call to action showed how admirable and responsible a man he is, and proves without a doubt that we should all take responsibility for creating the world in which all are granted life, liberty, and freedom.ReferencesKennedy, John F. (1961). John F. Kennedy Quotations, President Kennedys Inaugural Address, January 20, 1961. Retrieved from https//www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/Ready-Reference/JFK-Quotations/Inaugural-Address.aspxLife of John F. Kennedy. Retrieved from https//www.jfklibrary.org/JFK/Life-of-John-F-Kennedy.aspx

Comparing Poems Salome, Hitcher, On My First Sonne and The Man He Kille

Comparing Poems Salome, Hitcher, On My First Sonne and The Man He Killed The metrical compositions, Salome, Hitcher, On My First Sonne and The Man He Killed all have similar themes. The menacing and threatening ideas that the poets aimd are all based round death. However, each poem has a different perspective on the word with different motives and emotions. The Man He Killed is about a objet dart who talks of the experience he had of shooter someone and the regrets he has for it. He feels guilty, as he has no conceivable explanation for shooting the man. He talks of the similarities he and his foe had such as He thought hed list, perhaps, Off hand like - just as I. The use of hesitation and repetition show the threatening side of the story. It is almost as if he himself is trying to construct an image in his mind as not to make himself look or feel guilty or censurable. The use of colloquialism makes the image even more menacing as we do not underst and greatly of this man. Originally, it could be perceived as an old man who regrets his actions in the past. It however, could also be seen as a man who enjoyed killing but must come up with an excuse to the reasons for killing him. My foe of course he was, thats clear enough, although. The poem Hitcher has a character that expresses violence in a completely different manner. The poem is a monologue where the loudspeaker system casually admits to possibly murdering an innocent hitchhiker. The speaker tells us that he has been taking time off work - faking illness and not answering his phone. Being threaten with the sack, he goes in to work again and gets a lift to his hired car. As he drives out of L... ...he spot. Both of the poems are confusing and surreal as Hitcher is about the idea of jealousness compared to Salome, which is about the idea of hatred. Both The Man He Killed and On My First Sonne are menacing in a different way. They both(prenom inal) are about guilt and empathy. The Man he Killed is a dramatic monologue of a man confessing to murder whereas On My First Sonne is an elegy to his Son. In On My First Sonne the man is desperate for the reason why his son was taken and feels pain and rage. When compared to The Man He Killed, he is looking for the reason for why he shot him but feels neither pain nor anger. All the poems show menacing and threatening ideas but are not all based around violence. The poets use technical methods to hide a story. They do this by using repetition of words, hesitations and enjambment.

Vladimir Lenin :: Vladimir Lenin Essays

Vladimir Lenin, whos real name was Vladimir Ilch Ulyanov, played an important theatrical role in shaping the character of the twentieth century western world. He oversaw the most far-reaching revolution that in 1917 radically changed the political and social structure of Russia and oddment of power in the world. Being an important historical figure in Russia, Lenin is treated more like a god. To the Russian public, he is presented as strong, wise, courageous, and kind. Lenins infallibility, or accuracy, was so strong that his words pervaded every level of daily life. Such as newspapers, storybooks, etc. Children were taught to follow his example and adults were told to follow his path and advice on how to be hardworking, loyal communists. Since the revolution more than 350 million works by Lenin have been published in the former USSR. He is the ultimate mentor and give-up the ghost for all soviets, like he was a god or idle. He had the final authority on every aspect of their lif e. Anyone who visits the Soviet Union then(prenominal) and now is bound to be shocked by the utter extravagance of the nations adulation with him. Americans today can not even scope why the Soviets idolize one man so much. It inspires guilt in Americans about their own revolutionary past. But, to the extremes of which the worship of Lenin is carried makes us ask ourselves who he rightfully was.As you will see the man and the myth are often difficult to distinguish. Lenins likeness appears before the Soviets very often and in many an(prenominal) different ways so that he is almost too easy to forget about. An example would be, in a park in Kiev, a floral arrangement is fashioned to resemble his face. In Moscow this adulation reaches an absurd height. In Red Square people wait in an endless unaccompanied to see his tomb. While in this line an eternal flame honors the millions of soviets who died in World War Two. Who was Lenin really? A god, a man, or something else. Where did he deduct from? What did he believe? Why did the Soviets immortalize him so relentlessly? Lenin was born in the backwater town of Simbirsk in 1870. He grew up in a comfortably educated family in provincial Russia. He excelled at school and went on to study law. At university, he was exposed to radical thinking, and his views were also influenced by the executing of his elder brother, a member of a revolutionary group.