Hewlett Packard Swot Analysis Essay

The Hewlett-Packard and Compaq nuclear fusion response end illustration study provided many points necessary in the apprehensiveness of why these both companies would allow a risky task venture. Compaq was a society that began fortunately with record setting financial statements, but in an attempt to thrive its foodstuff, threatened fraternity stability. With the acquisition of Tandem Com put downer and Digital Equipment Corporation, Compaq see decreased revenues resulting in their inability to fully recover. In a war-ridden information technology market, HP was one of the diligence leadership. Due to a failure to be proactive to market changes, HP grew stagnant and looked to create company strategies through red-hotly appointed President/CEO Carly Fiorina. combative advantages for both HP and Compaq embroil visualize and printing department and last performance PC technology respectively. Managements reasons for the amalgamation included their assumption that together, HP and Compaq would be equal to replicate and overtake competitors. Oppositions to the nuclear fusion included a decrease in percentageholder inte liberalizations, a decline of focus for company core competencies, and an unpro exitcap qualified future tense. Several financial advisors and exertion psychoanalysts were in suss outment that the proposed nuclear fusion would not be in the trounce interests of either company. Despite the uncertainties, information gathered and forecasts projected were in party favour of the nuclear fusion reaction, which resulted in shareholder approval and the uniting of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq Computer. turn out abstractIn researching Hewlett-Packards present-day company position, a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis was conducted. Strengths found include HPs strong market position internation each(prenominal)(prenominal)y and on the domestic end, a successful step-up throughout large acquisiti ons, and a considerable brand value. HP currently has a 28.6% market share in the United States of America while internationally they stand at 17.7%. As the current number one leader in PC gross sales, HP has a solid market position. Although the strengths are allowing HP to honour market position, there are also weaknesses present in all companies. Compared to other companies in the same patience, Hewlett-Packard lacks significant software fruit and trouble consulting services. As a result, Hewlett-Packards weakness is its weak market segment consolidation. HP is able to declaration consumer subscribe to when it comes to PC technology and resource and printing software, but they fall short in the software product creation and consulting services to combine with their successful departments of PC technology and image and printing services.As Hewlett-Packard continues to grow and seek an increase in market position, opportunities surface. A spin-off of the PC technology bus iness, entering the cloud cypher market, and expanding imaging and printing solutions portfolio are opportunities HP has going forward. In placing much(prenominal) emphasis on the PC technology aspect of the company, HP may find that this venture pass on become as profitable as the imaging and printing department in the long-run. With the announcement of this spin-off, their share of US PC shipment increased from 25.4% to 28.9%. This positive reaction from consumers is an early indicant of possible success as a result of placing resources to build up the PC technology department. Cloud computing is a fairly new concept in which resources and software are delivered through a network, in general over the Internet. As this is market quickly growing in demand, HPs introduction of HP Cloud Assure is a massive opportunity for future prosperity. With success comes opportunities of threats, and Hewlett-Packard is no exception.With projected decrease in information technology (IT) in the near future, an increase in demand for non PC devices, and competitors with much diversified portfolios, HPs threats are numerous. perseverance analysts confirm projected a decrease of IT in upcoming quarters which will decrease HPs profitability. HP has already witnessed a decrease in consumer spending during last quarters back-to-school spending. If analyst projections prove to be true, changes will quickly need to be make. As more and more consumers are entering the non PC device era, HP is losing a segment of the market with their inability to provide products for this demand. HPs more diversified competitors such as dell and Samsung are able to easily capture the demand for these tablets.Future of the CompanyThrough the baptistry study, present-day SWOT analysis, and outside research conducted on Hewlett-Packard, the company has conclude that the company will remain constant, but unless strategies are implemented to answer more consumer demands, they may lose marke t share. New CEO meg Whitman has a technology visionary that will shift HPs focus to answering consumer demands. Her leadership capabilities and projections for company future are a desirable mix for a company to achieve sustainable future relevance. With the implementation of HP Cloud Assure, a new venture capitalizing on the growing consumer interest of cloud computing, HP is already adapting to answering the demands of consumers. As long as the company continues to anticipate and provide the products and services desired, sustainability will be maintained.Questions1. What are the strategic challenges that HP is facing?Strategic challenges Cost- diminution initiatives that included difficult but necessary voluntary- severance programs and manufacturing consolidations. Unacceptably highschool expense growth contributed to a decline in earnings from operations and net earnings. HP had a weak macroeconomic environment and competitive price pressures that led to slumping sales. Man agement was unable to keep pace of the ever-changing market conditions which were a disclose contributor. HP management failed to follow Dells lead in adopting a low- cost, Internet based cultivate sales channel to offset its reliance on the retail channel. * Accelerating growth in existing businesses* Streamlining the existing decentralized operating model to kindle growth opportunities * Implementing a total customer experience approach * fetching advantage of HPs strong correspondence sheet and bullion generation capability to fund new growth initiatives * Leveraging HPs market position* Creating e- services ecosystems and placing HP at the piazza2. Is the proposed merger likely to address these challenges? Benefits from the merger included personal systems, improve economics, and innovation. HP management believed that the combined company would have a discredit cost structure due to economies of scale. HP would also be able to leverage Compaqs progress in developing a unionize sales channel, yielding a more flexible distribution model. complemental leadership in key markets Compaqs strength in industry standard servers, coupled with HPs Linus and UNIX offerings, would result in an industry- star(p) product line spanning the entire server category. By adding HPs strength in high- end stock, the combined company would be the industry leader in both the endeavor storage segment and the alacritous growing sub-segment storage area networks.Doubling HPs sales force, the merger would allow HP to increase account coverage and go bad compete for important customer engagements around the world. IT Services Strengthened agate line Provides Critical Mass in Key Growth Market- Management believed the merger would significantly strengthen HP and Compaqs combined services business for several(prenominal) reasons. Financial Benefits- As predicted the merger would yield $2.5 billion in annual cost saving by mid-2004. Yes, we do believe the proposed merger is likely to address the challenges HP faces.3. How do you interpret the markets reaction to the proposal passel? We interpret the markets reaction to the proposed deal to be negative. Just two months of the Merger announcement, HPs share price trailed the preannouncement level by 27%, representing a sacking of $12.3 billion of market share value at the same cadence comparable companies increased 9.9%. 4. If you were a shareholder of HP, how would you vote on the deal? If we were shareholders of HP, we would vote against the deal. It is obvious the company is losing a great deal of specie at the same time other companies in the same industry are making money. The merger is not looking out for the top hat interest of the shareholders so we would not vote for the merger.SourcesBloomberg condescensionweekhttp//www.businessweek.com/news/2011-10-12/hewlett-packard-gains-pc-market-share-after-mulling-spinoff.html CNN Moneyhttp//money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/ 02/07/8250437/index.htm http//money.cnn.com/2011/09/22/technology/hp_ceo_fired/index.htm Hewlett-Packard Websitehttp//www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2009/090331xa.htmlHewlett-Packard Case StudyHewlett-Packard Compaq The Merger ratiocinationMarketing Researchhttp//www.marketingresearch.com/marketing/swot-analysis-hewlett-packardJennifer Brown digestThe process of complete this assignment has helped me discover how to view business decisions in a more analytical way. When approaching this one it seemed overwhelming at premier. I began displace outside sources and background information that helped me gain a better arrest of the project at hand. That extra research was very useful in explaining what the companies were going through and giving different perspectives as to why. I was able to apply what I have learned in my accounting classes when the event study and articles referred to financial ratios and provided financial fields. That was helpful when trying to answer the questions assigned. functional with a group was also beneficial because there were several multiplication my group members made great points that I may have deep in thought(p) working alone.Our group has met several times since the project has been assigned. I have been present at each meeting. Before we met the first time we determined we would read the case study in full to have an understanding of what we would need to do. Our first meeting we discussed the case study and our stance on what HP should do. We also discussed the questions within the case study and started our outline for our indicator point. Outside of the meeting I researched articles to gain background information. Our group had several more meetings at which we outlined our strategy report and assigned each person a portion of the report. When we were finished with our portion we would submit it to the rest of the group for proofreading. Everybody completed their task as set and we came together as a group an d finalized the report. I, as well as the other members of the group, contributed to the formation and layout of both the strategy report and the power point.Charnele Hodge SynopsisBeing that this has been my first time in a group doing a strategy report on a company, I similarlyk away a few key elements. I have learned, understood, and properly utilize the purpose of a SWOT Analysis. I know this form of analysis will be used in my future endeavors, so I know it will be very beneficial to me. Also, I learned while in a group setting how to effectively achieve a SWOT Analysis to inform and persuade others to understand and see our point-of-view on our particular position. As a Business Management major, this group project has helped me realize that in not every group setting, that there needs to be a set leader. In my group, I felt that everyone meshed well with each other and there was not a constant need for soulfulness to be in charge. Every group member knew what was at bet and that being at meetings and pulling her part in the group was essential.My separate function to the group was making sure that I gave my opinion on the different positions that we would be taking on the SWOT Analysis. I made it my individual objective to make sure that I pulled my part in completing each and every task that I volunteered to work on, that it was make properly, as well as completed on time. Being a Business Management major, I believe I helped bring balance among my other peers that are majoring in different genres in the college of business. I took a more realistic, rational approach to the group, in who would be better fit for particular objectives.Sakina Middleton SynopsisConducting a strategy report required employ resources from all aspects of my undergraduate studies. I was able to read the Hewlett-Packard and Compaq merger decision and understand the different aspects used to compile the information. In utilizing marketing concepts, I was able to conduct a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of Hewlett-Packards present company structure. My management background allowed for an understanding of company decisions made, such as whether to undergo a merger. Finally, the accounting knowledge I have acquired thus remote has enabled me to read and comprehend the many financial statements used to decide which options should be made based on the factual numbers provided. Overall, my primary takeaway was my ability to read, comprehend, and analyze a case study regarding two integrate companies with the knowledge and education provided by Savannah State Universitys College of Business Administration.Throughout this project I was able to increase my ability to fuss solve in a group of my colleagues. No one group is perfect, but the communication skills I have acquired allowed me to handle all situations befittingly and in a timely fashion. For this strategy report, I was responsible for placement all group me etings regarding the collection and accumulation of information for the paper. I was the instigator of correspondence and also the channel of delivery for every members designated portion of the paper. My personal contribution includes the compilation on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the present-day company Hewlett-Packard. I was also responsible for the editing of the final paper.Summer Wilcox SynopsisIn March 2002, Hewlett- Packards current CEO and president, Carleton Firiona announced the acquiring of HPs rival company, Compaq Computer. The merging of the two companies was designed to put Hewlett- Packard/Compaq in a position to challenge one of its top leaders in the industry, IBM. The merger was also designed to create a world(prenominal) technology powerhouse that would provide consumers with products and services demanded by profitable enterprise customers.After reading over the case, I started to feel like the merger was not going to be a success. The merger presented itself to be too risky. Although Hewlett Packard was aiming to become the industrys leader by expanding into new markets, the head of the merger just didnt seem to look out for the dress hat interest of the company. Management felt that HP and Compaq needed to improve their unanimous business structure to effectively compete with Dell which was the industrys leader. They also felt that HP and Compaqs leadership would complement each other in key markets such as the enterprise storage segment and storage area networks, and by having a broader portfolio of products and services. Management believed that HP and Compaq had a weak combination of products and services, and merging would strengthen that area.While approximately thought that the merger would be a success to Hewlett- Packard, there were well-nigh who were against it. Among those few were the director and son of HP cofounder William Hewlett, Walter Hewlett. Walter Hewlett was HPs moment largest sha reholder and had a very powerful, important voting privilege of HP. Walter was against the merger for 4 main reasons. He felt the proposed merger would be worse, the integration risk of the proposed merger would be substantial, the financial impact on HPs stockholders would remain negative, and the position of the company would not improve.I agree with opposing the merger of HP and Compaq. They knew from the beginning stages that the merger was going to be risky. Shareholders would lose and ample amount of value on their shares. Stockholders would get a very small amount of the combined companys contribution to earnings. The merger would drown the stockholders interest in the imaging and printing business which is the most profitable of HP already. The merger would not improve the position of the company. Furthermore, HP had no experience with handling a merger of that size. All HP had to do was invest and focus more on the printing and imaging part of the company. The printing and imaging change in low-end printers and supplies to commercial printing solutions. Instead of taking such a risky acquisition, they could have focused on something that proved already successful for the business.My contribution to the overall strategy report was to research where HP stands now. I also found official documents filed by both HP and Compaq to the secondment about the planned merger. The documents further explained forward- looking statements, assumptions, uncertainties, and risk of the planned merger between the two companies.