Analysis Of Spinoza And Nietzsche s Spinoza - 1699 Words

â€Å"Spinoza,† Deleuze tells us in his 1978 lectures, doesn t make up a morality, for a very simple reason: he never asks what we must do, he always asks what we are capable of, what s in our power, ethics is a problem of power, never a problem of duty. In this sense Spinoza is profoundly immoral. Regarding the moral problem, good and evil†¦he doesn t even comprehend what this means. What he comprehends are good encounters, bad encounters, increases and diminutions of power. Thus he makes an ethics and not at all a morality. This is why he so struck Nietzsche. Historically, the distinction between ethics and morality was set up to distinguish between an Aristotelian/Stoic emphasis on the good or virtuous life and a Kantian emphasis on the moral law. Spinoza and Nietzsche are heretic hiccups in this history and Deleuze draws upon them heavily, working out an immanent theory of ethics in his early monographs on them. He expanded upon a matching ontology much later, in Anti-Oedipus, which Foucault called â€Å"the first book of ethics to be written in France in a long time.† The connection between ontology and ethics is inseverable, and Deleuze’s focus on the primacy of ethics natural, for there is only one [immanent] cause, and†¦this influences practice. Spinoza didn t entitle his book Ontology, he s too shrewd for that, he entitles it Ethics. Which is a way of saying that, whatever the importance of my speculative propositions may be, you can only judge them at the level ofShow MoreRelatedBeyond the Problem of Evil Essa y6495 Words   |  26 Pagestradition. As such, I will attempt first, to outline the problem of evil in the starkest terms possible, presenting Augustines approach to its solution followed by a critical analysis; second, to present an alternative approach to the questions which give rise to the problem--an approach derived in large part from Spinoza and Nietzsche; and, third, to show how this more philosophically acceptable alternative can be expressed in the categories of faith, allowing us to reappropriate the tradition *beyondRead MorePhilosophy C100 Quiz 121572 Words   |  7 Pagesbut the   X | world of Forms which can only be grasped intellectually. |    | shadows seen on the wall of The Cave in his allegory. |    | sayings of the Delphic Oracle. |    | All of the above. |    | None of the above. | 19.   In the last analysis, for Plato attaining true knowledge could only come through X   | being skeptical of sense data entirely. |   X | learning to use the Socratic method rigorously. |    | the process of remembering what one already knew. |    | listening closelyRead MoreComparing Twentieth Century Political Thought Leo Strauss And Richard Rorty1421 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction When it comes to an analysis of twentieth century political thought Leo Strauss and Richard Rorty are two indispensable figures. Rorty was a pupil of Strauss at the University of Chicago, and was always quick to acknowledge the influence that his former teacher had on his writing. In the following paper I will briefly highlight and critique the fundamental arguments presented by the duo. Certainly, Rorty and Strauss share a degree of commonality in their critique of the EnlightenmentRead MoreAristotle And Plato s Influence On Western Philosophical Tradition2851 Words   |  12 PagesBasically it is divided into two main groups: the Rationalists, who were mostly in France and Germany that argued that all knowledge must begin from certain innate ideas.† Some major rationalists were Rene Descartes, Nicolas Malebranche, Baruch Spinoza, and Gottfried Leibniz. The second group, the Empiricists, held that knowledge must begin with sensory experience. Some major figures in this line of thought were John Locke, David Hume, and George Berkeley. Immanuel Kant is retrospectively responsibleRead MoreBranches of Philosophy8343 Words   |  34 Pagesreconciling the diversity and change of the natural universe, with the possibility of obtaining fixed and certain knowledge about it; questions about things which cannot be perceived by the senses, such as numbers, elements, universals, and gods; the analysis of patterns of reasoning and argument; the nature of the good life and the importance of understanding and knowledge in order to pursue it; the explication of the concept of justice, and its relation to various political systems[8]. In this periodRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pagesand permission should be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. To obtain permission(s) to use material from this work, please submit a written request to Pearson Education, Inc., Permissions Department, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458, or you may fax your request to 201-236-3290. Many of the designations by manufacturers