Women in World History :: Essays Papers

Women in World History After see the works of Hughes and Hughes, Ward, and Pomeroy, it seems as though all the information is congruent in the readings. The facts presented in Hughes and Hughes that also exist in the works by Pomeroy and Ward. The repeating solidifies the facts as stated by all troika authors. The reoccurrence between the three pieces shows similarities. The similarities show the reader the strength of the information. Women of ancient Egypt had some of the same rights as men, they could rule as long as they showed some masculine traits to service of process the people understand why they were in power. In Ward and Pomeroys texts, there is information that the Egyptian women had the same well-grounded rights as the Egyptian men. The women of the family could not only administer the family airscrew, but could also dispute legal decisions and be major litigants defending what they conceived to be their rights of inheritance (Ward 7). The women of ancient E gypt were able-bodied to accomplish a lot on their own. It was possible for fathers to leave property to their daughters in their wills so that the daughter could be self sufficient, should the need arise. A wife could even help run the estate with her husband. Women were also allowed to calculate parties where men were present. This was an uncommon practice that women of ancient times were not allowed to do, the women would arrive at to leave the room. Traditionally women were not allowed to be seen in the presence of a group of men, except in the case of the women of ancient Egypt. Aside from complaisant privileges, women were also granted economic privileges. Traditionally a wife would be dependent upon her husband for economic support, however the women of ancient Egypt were not all in all dependent. Should a divorce take place, the legal system moved in to assure a fair settlement.First, the husband and wife to each one took back whatever property they had co ntributed at the time of marriage. Second, any supererogatory property that had accrued during the marriage was divided between them two-thirds to the husband, one-third to the wife. In this way, the woman became financially independent, did not have to return to her own family, and efficiency even be considered a good prospect for a act marriage (Ward 7).